DIOPSIDE
CaMgSi2O6,
calcium magnesium silicate
Diopside must surely have been found in some of the earliest openings in the Franklin Marble and appears in early lists of the local minerals, but Palache (1935, p. 62) remarked that all specimens so labeled from old collections had turned out to be some other mineral, and that the first definitive evidence of its presence was an unpublished chemical analysis made in 1926 by Lawson Bauer, chemist for the New Jersey Zinc Company. Despite such early confusion, diopside is a common mineral locally, with numerous authenticated specimens now known.
Diopside from the Franklin Marble is generally close to end-member CaMgSi2O6, is white to nearly colorless, occurs generally in a matrix of coarse-grained marble, and fluoresces bright pale blue under shortwave (SW) ultraviolet (UV) light. The activator of the blue fluorescence is probably titanium (as TiO6 groups), present in the diopside as an impurity. Norbergite and tremolite are the most commonly associated silicate minerals, but numerous other silicates have been found with diopside as well. Most diopside in the Franklin Marble occurs as fairly small (2-5 mm), equant to slightly elongated grains and rough crystals, often scattered within the host marble (DPS11), but in some specimens forming dense aggregates or layers of nearly pure material (DPS20). Specimens of such diopside are familiar to most collectors of the local minerals and have been recovered from numerous exposures of the Franklin Marble throughout its extent, from the Sparta, N.J. area in the south to the Amity, N.Y. area in the north. Similar specimens have been recovered underground in the Franklin and Sterling zinc mines, but only in the Franklin Marble, in areas external to the Zn-Mn-Fe orebodies.
Diopside from the zinc-rich orebodies at Franklin and Sterling Hill is of wholly different character from that in the Franklin Marble. Far from being pure, it often contains appreciable zinc, manganese, and iron, and occurs as tan, brown, or ivory-colored grains and granular aggregates with a pronounced platy appearance (DPS4, DPS7, DPS12) due to closely spaced basal parting surfaces (Palache, 1935, p. 62). Cleavage is also present but in most specimens is visually subordinate to the partings. Grain size varies considerably but is often coarse, with individual grains 2-10 cm across, and some larger. As noted by Dunn (1995, p. 433), commonly associated minerals include andradite, franklinite, willemite, and calcite, and also hardystonite, bustamite, rhodonite, and apatite. In some specimens the parting surfaces bear thin films of nearly colorless to white clinohedrite. Until recently it was thought that diopside from the Franklin and Sterling Hill orebodies does not fluoresce. In 1917-1918, however, several specimens of “white schefferite” (low-iron diopside) from Franklin were observed to fluoresce red under longwave (LW) UV light (Verbeek et al., 1918). The fluorescence is of only dim to moderate brightness, similar in color to that of bustamite, but is unmistakable (DPS17).
The wide compositional range of pyroxenes in the Franklin and Sterling Hill orebodies gave rise to several varietal names that remained in use until relations among the various pyroxene species became better defined. Zinc schefferite and schefferite are the most common of these and were described under those headings by Palache (1935, p. 62-63). Zinc schefferite had earlier been described by Hillebrand (1900) and Wollf and Melczer (1900), and schefferite a decade later by Palache (1910). Numerous specimens in old collections bear such names, and most of them, particularly those of pale to medium brown color, conform to what we now know as diopside. White schefferite is another such term and refers to diopside of overall ivory-white color. A comprehensive revision of the nomenclature of the pyroxenes (Morimoto et al., 1978) led to abandonment of those names, plus more than 100 others, and to the formal acceptance of the species names in use today.
The number of possible elemental substitutions in the pyroxenes,
and the existence of at least partial solid-solution series among many of them, frustrate attempts to identify these minerals to the species level without a comprehensive chemical analysis. With increasing iron content, for example, diopside grades into hedenbergite, and with increasing Mg content it grades into augite. All three species are known from both the Franklin and Sterling Hill deposits. The pyroxene quadrilateral shown to the right depicts the compositional ranges of diopside, augite, and hedenbergite with respect to the pure Ca, Mg, and Fe end members. It is important to realize, however, that additional substituents, most notably Mn and Zn, appear in Franklin-Sterling Hill pyroxenes as well. Dunn (1995) suggested that only light-colored pyroxenes from the Franklin-Sterling Hill area be termed diopside unless proven otherwise. Darker brown to dark green pyroxenes are commonly augite but could also be the sodic (Na-rich) pyroxenes aegirine-augite or aegirine, also known locally. Hedenbergite, due to its high iron content, is dark green to nearly black, but so too is much diopside containing lesser amounts of iron.
References
Betancourt, P.B. (1989), The epidote-pyroxene-fluorapophyllite assemblage in the Franklin mine at Franklin, New Jersey. The Picking Table, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 8-10. [Mentions a pale green pyroxene, regarded as probable diopside, from the title assemblage at Franklin]
Bostwick, R.C. (1977), The fluorescent minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, NJ. The Picking Table, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 15-24. [Short description of daylight appearance and fluorescence of diopside from the Franklin Marble on p. 24]
Bostwick, R.C. (1992), The check list of Franklin-Sterling Hill fluorescent minerals: discussion and update. The Picking Table, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 4-11. [Fluorescence of diopside described in brief on p. 10]
Bostwick, R.C. (2016), Fluorescent minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, N.J., Part 1. The Picking Table, vol. 57, no. 2, p. 10-22. [Diopside discussed on p. 20]
Dunn, P.J. (1995), Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey: the world’s most magnificent mineral deposits. Privately published, 755 p. [Full description of diopside on p. 432-434; chemical analyses of several specimens in Table 10 on p. 430]
Edwards, F.Z. (1972), The fluorescent minerals of the Franklin/Ogdensburg area: The Picking Table, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 11-13. [Mentions on p. 12 a “good blue-white” fluorescence of local diopside, but this is true only for diopside from the Franklin Marble]
Frondel, Clifford (1972), The minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill - a checklist. Wiley Interscience, New York, 94 pp. [Good one-paragraph description of diopside on p. 53]
Grenier, Gary (2004), The art of fluorescent mineral photography, with special attention to the minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, Part II. The Picking Table, vol. 45, no. 1, p. 9-21. [Brief discussion of fluorescence of diopside from a photographer’s viewpoint on p. 10-11]
Hillebrand, F.W. (1900), Mineralogical notes: Jeffersonite. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 167, p. 68-69.
Johnson, C.A. (1990), Petrologic and stable isotopic studies of the metamorphosed zinc-iron-manganese deposit at Sterling Hill, New Jersey. Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 108 pp. [Includes chemical analyses of diopsides from Sterling Hill]
King, V.T., King, N.E., Betancourt, P.P., Bostwick, R.C., Chin, Peter, Hecht, T.J., Kuitems, S.M., Moritz, Harold, Nemetz, J.D., Nikischer, A.J., Sanford, Stephen, Van Fleet, J.A., and Verbeek, E.R. (2021), The Mineralogy of Franklin and Ogdensburg, New Jersey—A Photographic Celebration. Privately published, 1400 pp. [Fluorescence described on p. 17; photos of fluorescent specimens on p. 94-96; others on p. 852-853]
Morimoto, N., Fabries, J., Ferguson, A.K., Ginzburg, I.V., Ross, M., Seifert, F.A., Zussman, J., Aoki, J., and Gottardi, G. (1988), Nomenclature of pyroxenes. The American Mineralogist, vol. 73, p. 1123-1133. [Comprehensive revision of pyroxene nomenclature; led to acceptance of 20 species names and abandonment of 105 superfluous names]
Moritz, Harold and Craig, F.M. (2023), Analyses of clinopyroxenes from Franklin and Ogdensburg, New Jersey, U.S.A. The Picking Table, vol. 64, no. 1, p. 12.
Palache, Charles (1910), Contributions to the mineralogy of Franklin Furnace, N. J. American Journal of Science, 4th Series, vol. 29, p. 177-187.
Palache, Charles (1935), The minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, Sussex County, New Jersey. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 180, 135 pp. [Description of diopside and its varieties (schefferite, zinc schefferite) on p. 61-63.]
Reilly, L.C., (1983), An analysis of calc-silicate bands of the Sterling Hill zinc deposit, Sussex County, New Jersey. Senior Thesis, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 90 pp. [Mentions rhodonite exsolved from diopsidic pyroxene from Sterling Hill]
Verbeek, E.R., Mazel, Charles, and Kuitems, S.M. (2018), Red-fluorescent diopside from the orebody at Franklin, New Jersey. The Picking Table, vol. 60, no. 1, p. 25-27.
Wolff, J.E. and Melczer, G. (1900), On hardystonite and a zinc schefferite from Franklin Furnace, New Jersey, with a note on the optical constants of the schefferite. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, vol. 36, no. 7, p. 113-118. [Provides a description, chemical analysis, and optical data on newly found specimens of pyroxene from Franklin].
Images