BORNITE
Cu5FeS4,
copper iron sulfide
Bornite has been found at both Franklin and Sterling Hill, though in minor amounts, and rarely in some of the area marble quarries. It was first identified from Franklin in 1928, in a specimen analyzed by Lawson Bauer, chief chemist for the New Jersey Zinc Company (Palache, 1928). The specimen consisted of bornite intimately mixed with sphalerite, but the analysis, after deducting the components both known and believed to be present in the sphalerite, conformed almost perfectly to the composition of bornite. Its presence at Franklin was later verified by Frondel (1972), who reported it also from Sterling Hill and remarked that numerous specimens had been found since Palache’s time. Bornite at both localities occurs in massive granular form, commonly mixed with other sulfide minerals such as sphalerite (as in the original occurrence, described by Palache), chalcopyrite, and galena.
Bornite tarnishes readily, and hardly ever is its true color (reddish to bronzy brown) observed in natural specimens except upon a fresh break. Iridescent colors of blue through purple are common in tarnished massive material, lending to bornite the common appellation of “peacock ore.” It should be noted that other sulfide minerals, including chalcocite (common locally), chalcopyrite, pyrite, galena, and others, can develop similar iridescent tarnishes, resulting in more specimens labeled bornite in area collections than actually exist. Iridescent franklinite, too, has commonly been mistaken for bornite, and to complicate matters, the term “peacock ore” in local parlance almost always refers to tarnished franklinite rather than bornite (Dunn, 1995, p. 530). True bornite can be identified by a hardness test (to distinguish it from the much harder franklinite) and by its color upon a fresh break, which will serve to distinguish it from chalcocite (black), pyrite (brass yellow) chalcopyrite (golden yellow), and galena (dark gray), all of which lack the reddish cast of fresh bornite. Galena also shows perfect cubic cleavage, so is readily identified even in highly tarnished masses. A positive flame test for copper is also helpful to distinguish bornite from some of the other local sulfides, though at least five other copper-bearing sulfides are known locally and commonly occur with bornite.
Bornite has not been much discussed in the local literature, and details of most occurrences are few or nonexistent. A welcome exception is the paper by Jenkins and Misiur (1994), in which the geologic setting and genesis of a complicated veinlet assemblage of sulfide minerals and their oxidation products were documented in detail. The sulfide assemblage occurred in marble near its contact with ore.
References
Cook, E. P., Fisher, K., Mutschler, F., and Navratil, G. (1958), The Buckwheat and Parker Dump minerals, Franklin, N.J. Franklin Mineral Digest, vol. 1, p. 27-30. [Describes bornite as “quite common” on the Buckwheat and Parker dumps, but generally in small grains and disseminations rather than large masses. Lists a number of assemblages]
Dunn, P.J. (1995), Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey: The world’s most magnificent mineral deposits. Privately published, 755 pp. [Description of bornite on p. 530]
Frondel, C. (1972), The minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill - a checklist. Wiley Interscience, New York, 94 pp. [Verifies presence of bornite at Franklin and mentions recovery of numerous specimens since Palache’s first mention in 1928; also mentions its presence at Sterling Hill]
Jenkins, R.E., II and Misiur, S.C. (1994), A complex base-metal assemblage from the Sterling Mine, New Jersey. The Picking Table, vol. 35, no. 2, p. 19-24. [Detailed description of the mineralogy, paragenesis, and origin of sulfide minerals and their alteration products in a Cu-Pb-Zn veinlet assemblage below 700 level in the Sterling mine]
King, V.T., King, N.E., Betancourt, P.P., Bostwick, R.C., Chin, Peter, Hecht, T.J., Kuitems, S.M., Moritz, H., Nemetz, J.D., Nikischer, A.J., Sanford, S., Van Fleet, J.A., and Verbeek, E.R. (2021), The Mineralogy of Franklin and Ogdensburg, New Jersey—A Photographic Celebration. Privately published, 1400 pp. [Photos of three bornite specimens shown on p. 796]
Palache, C. (1928), Mineralogical notes on Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey. American Mineralogist, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 297-329. [First mention of bornite from Franklin; identification based on chemical analysis of impure material]
Palache, Charles. (1935), The minerals of Franklin and Sterling Hill, Sussex County, New Jersey. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 180, 135 pp. [Provides on p. 29 the same information as in his 1928 paper]
Images